Philosophy has so far never been attacked for its obscurity, though it is often obscure, sometimes quite beyond the patience of the lay reader.
What passes for profundity is often hyper-abstraction—smoke. But rather than complain about this, readers wait for the philosophy text that traffics in known quantities and recognizable thrusts, hoping the way will be made clear. Eventually. Some day.
Of course, some philosophers would claim that every bit of abstraction in a philosophy text is justified and earned, and that to simplify the language would necessarily impair the complexity of the argument being made.
